Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Página inicial / You Tube Funny Research Methods Video

You Tube Funny Research Methods Video

Postar um comentário

Review

doi: 10.2196/mededu.8527.

Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review

Affiliations

  • PMID: 29434018
  • PMCID: PMC5826977
  • DOI: 10.2196/mededu.8527

Free PMC article

Review

Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review

Brandy Drozd  et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Online medical education has relevance to public health literacy and physician efficacy, yet it requires a certain standard of reliability. While the internet has the potential to be a viable medical education tool, the viewer must be able to discern which information is reliable.

Objective: Our aim was to perform a literature review to determine and compare the various methods used when analyzing YouTube videos for patient education efficacy, information accuracy, and quality.

Methods: In November 2016, a comprehensive search within PubMed and Embase resulted in 37 included studies.

Results: The review revealed that each video evaluation study first established search terms, exclusion criteria, and methods to analyze the videos in a consistent manner. The majority of the evaluators devised a scoring system, but variations were innumerable within each study's methods.

Conclusions: In comparing the 37 studies, we found that overall, common steps were taken to evaluate the content. However, a concrete set of methods did not exist. This is notable since many patients turn to the internet for medical information yet lack the tools to evaluate the advice being given. There was, however, a common aim of discovering what health-related content the public is accessing, and how credible that material is.

Keywords: YouTube; health literacy; internet; online education; social media; videos.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1

Search results and excluded studies.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Video data collected by various studies as of Nov 2016 (results based on all 37 studies reviewed).

Similar articles

  • Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.

    Birch EM, Leziak K, Jackson J, Dahl E, Niznik CM, Yee LM. Birch EM, et al. JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Apr 7;7(2):e30156. doi: 10.2196/30156. JMIR Diabetes. 2022. PMID: 35389355 Free PMC article.

  • Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.

    Ferhatoglu MF, Kartal A, Ekici U, Gurkan A. Ferhatoglu MF, et al. Obes Surg. 2019 May;29(5):1477-1484. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-03738-2. Obes Surg. 2019. PMID: 30706318

  • YouTube Videos as a Source of Misinformation on Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

    Goobie GC, Guler SA, Johannson KA, Fisher JH, Ryerson CJ. Goobie GC, et al. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 May;16(5):572-579. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201809-644OC. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019. PMID: 30608877

  • The reliability of YouTube videos in patients education for Glioblastoma Treatment.

    ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Yoon JW, Justice J, Kerezoudis P, Parney IF, Bendok BR, Chaichana KL, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. ReFaey K, et al. J Clin Neurosci. 2018 Sep;55:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 31. J Clin Neurosci. 2018. PMID: 30075980 Review.

  • The Reliability of YouTube Videos Describing Stereotactic Radiosurgery: A Call for Action.

    ReFaey K, Tripathi S, Bohnen AM, Waddle MR, Peterson J, Vazquez-Ramos C, Bondoc CM, Quiñones-Hinojosa A, Trifiletti DM. ReFaey K, et al. World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e398-e402. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.086. Epub 2019 Jan 28. World Neurosurg. 2019. PMID: 30703604

Cited by 45 articles

  • Analysis of the Educational Value of YouTube Laparoscopic Appendectomy Videos.

    Park KB, Kim MJ, Lee JS. Park KB, et al. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019 Sep 15;22(3):119-126. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2019.22.3.119. J Minim Invasive Surg. 2019. PMID: 35599696 Free PMC article.

  • Can "YouTube" help healthcare workers for learning accurate donning and doffing of personal protective equipments?

    Kozanhan B, Tutar MS, Arslan D. Kozanhan B, et al. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2022 May;40(5):241-247. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2020.11.023. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2022. PMID: 35577442 Free PMC article.

  • Analysis of YouTube videos as a source of information for myocarditis during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Memioglu T, Ozyasar M. Memioglu T, et al. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022 Apr 26:1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00392-022-02026-x. Online ahead of print. Clin Res Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35471259 Free PMC article.

  • Analysis of Quality, Usefulness, Reliability, Visibility, and Popularity of Videos about Dental Caries on YouTube: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

    Rachmawati YL, Putri DW, Hariyani N, Bahar A, Maharani DA. Rachmawati YL, et al. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022 Apr 8;12(2):245-251. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_246_21. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022. PMID: 35462746 Free PMC article.

  • Distal Biceps Tendon Rupture Videos on YouTube: An Analysis of Video Content and Quality.

    Foster BK, Malarkey WM, Maurer TC, Barreto Rocha DF, Udoeyo IF, Grandizio LC. Foster BK, et al. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021 Dec 1;4(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.10.009. eCollection 2022 Jan. J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2021. PMID: 35415601 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Fox S. Pew Research Center. 2011. The social life of health information http://www.pewinternet.org/2011/05/12/the-social-life-of-health-informat... <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="6s7uh4RUN"/>
    1. YouTube Statistics. https://www.youtube.com/yt/press/statistics.html <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="6s7kY9SuZ"/>.
    1. Hossler EW, Conroy MP. YouTube as a source of information on tanning bed use. Arch Dermatol. 2008 Oct;144(10):1395–1396. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1395. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bowers N, Chow C. Heart failure videos on YouTube - the good, the bad, and the ugly: A study on the utility and education value for patients, healthcare practitioners and learners. Can J Cardiol. 2016 Oct;32(10):S281. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.07.459. - DOI
    1. Gonzalez-Estrada A, Cuervo-Pardo L, Ghosh B, Smith M, Pazheri F, Zell K, Wang X-F, Lang DM. Popular on YouTube: a critical appraisal of the educational quality of information regarding asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36(6):e121–126. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3890. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

  • Full Text Sources

    • Europe PubMed Central
    • JMIR Publications
    • PubMed Central

  • Other Literature Sources

    • scite Smart Citations

ewingwitilly.blogspot.com

Source: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29434018/

Postar um comentário for "You Tube Funny Research Methods Video"